Kailashahar, Sep 21 (TIWN): Serious allegations have surfaced over the alleged unauthorized withdrawal of approximately Rs.11.94 lakh from the savings account of a government employee, with the complainant alleging that withdrawal slips bearing forged or misused signatures were used to access his funds.

According to the written complaint submitted to the concerned authorities of UCO Bank, the complainant, a resident of Durgapur in Kailashahar, claims that the alleged irregularities date back to 2021, when he had approached a bank branch in Dharmanagar in connection with a ?10 lakh home loan.

The complainant alleges that, during the loan process, he was asked to sign several withdrawal slips. Trusting the bank's procedures, he claims that he signed the documents without anticipating that they could subsequently be used for transactions without his knowledge.

He further alleges that those signed documents were later used to withdraw money from his savings account on multiple occasions. According to his complaint, he discovered the alleged transactions while checking his bank statement on January 5, 2026.

The complainant has alleged that there were 25 withdrawal transactions, while seven corresponding withdrawal slips have allegedly not been provided to him. He has also claimed that some of the documents contain signatures that he did not authorize.

One particular transaction has raised further questions, according to the complaint, as a withdrawal slip allegedly carried a different name while being used in connection with his account. The complainant has sought clarification on how such a transaction could have been processed.

In addition, he alleges that a ?2.42 lakh loan was sanctioned and subsequently withdrawn in his name on March 18, 2022, without his knowledge. The complaint refers to the associated loan account as 25200610008294.

The complainant has requested a comprehensive and independent examination of his account transactions, withdrawal slips and loan-related documents. He has also sought appropriate action and recovery of the money if the allegations are established.

The complaint further contains allegations concerning the financial assets of a former bank official. These claims have not been independently verified and are not being treated as established facts.

The allegations remain subject to investigation. A detailed examination of the bank records, original withdrawal documents, signatures and loan papers would be necessary to establish what actually occurred. A response from the bank and the outcome of any official inquiry are expected to provide greater clarity on the matter.