Make this your homepage
Tripura News
Home > Tripura News
‘India needs one ruler system’ : Ratan Lal’s R-Day speech exposed hatred for Indian Democracy, exposed BJP, RSS ideologies against India’s Constitution, attacks on India’s Federal system
TIWN Jan 26, 2020
‘India needs one ruler system’ : Ratan Lal’s R-Day speech exposed hatred for Indian Democracy, exposed BJP, RSS ideologies against India’s Constitution,  attacks on India’s Federal system
PHOTO : Left : Law Minister Ratanlal Nath (File), Right : Modi with RSS group. TIWN Photos.

AGARTALA, Jan 26 (TIWN): Tripura BJP’s JUMLA Minister, ex-Congress turncoat Ratan Lal’s Republic Day speech called for India’s one ruler system which is a reminder of Nazi era’s Fascism by Hitler, a BJP Minister’s speech reflected RSS, BJP’s hatred for Indian Constitution, Indian Democratic values of Multi Party Electoral Democratic system. .He said, one constitution, one rule and one leader should be the policy which was said by Jana Sangh’s founder Shyama Prasad Mukharjee, created controversy. He invested Mookerjee’s “ek nishan, ek vidhan, ek pradhan” (one flag, one constitution, one leader) slogan with the far deeper purpose of stamping out the distinctiveness that is the soul of India and forging a single nationwide identity.

However, the same person before 3 years was in Congress and maximum period of his life spent in Congress, worshipping the ideology of unity, integrity, diversity, whereas becoming the Minister of the BJP Govt’s cabinet, holding important depts, Nath today has called for Ek-Bidhan, Ek-Pradhan, Ek-Sangbidhan. However Constitution is one but so many articles the constitution has to save the multi-identities of Indian diverse culture, Nath was silent about that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrgY6WrC4K4&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR1N3lTJxky-lEBVkL6a9Hcp6ypFIQ_gX044G03RRorLZHOfY-GaXHF8xOI Ratanlal Nath addressing media

Because of same Govt ruling in State and Centre, Tripura is undergoing tremendous problems, citizens rights are snatched and no one to take the complaints as both the Govt at State and Centre are same.

That is why the importance of the federal system was felt again and again, when BJP is talking about only “One Identity”.

Tripura reportedly is just the mini version of India’s democracy as from UP to Delhi the situations of journalists, media persons remained more or less same. Among the various techniques to shutdown media voices, a daily newspaper Aajkaal was closed by BJP Govt after it stopped giving advertisement to the newspaper. At last this newspaper is closed leaving 33 employees jobless. Total 14 journalists were reporting from Agartala office itself who lost jobs.Earlier, another newspaper ‘Daily Desher Katha’ was shutdowned by the BJP Govt but under Court’s order it restarted but hawkers are not allowed to carry Daily Desher Katha. Various TV channels were too shutdowned by the BJP Govt whereas attacks on various media including Tripurainfoway indeed made already a history in Tripura's democracy butchering. 

However, bootlicker media were existing in the British era as well as thet are now.

Uncountable numbers of people were arrested in the state in last 21 months for criticizing the Govt, even for sharing news contents in social media. Recently, Tripura High Court expressed surprise how criminal acts can be imposed by police on the social media users just for criticizing a party after police arrested a Congress IT cell member.

On the other side, people’s houses are burnt, oppositions are attacked everyday, but so far Education Minister skipped to talk about that.

While pronouncing the historical order on Jammu and Kashmir issue and the ongoing restrictions in internet and public movements, Supreme Court on January 10, reminded the Govt that it can not repeatedly violate Freedom of Speech."Suspension of free movement, Internet and basic freedoms cannot be an arbitrary exercise of power," said the Supreme Court, asserting that "mere expression of dissent or disagreement against a government decision cannot be reason for Internet suspension." The court criticized the repeated use of Section 144, a colonial-era rule to ban large gatherings, in the former state that was bifurcated into two union territories as part of the government's decision to scrap Article 370. "It can't be used as a tool to oppress difference of opinion," the judges said.

Add your Comment
Comments (0)

Special Articles

Sanjay Majumder Sanjay Majumder
Anirban Mitra Anirban Mitra