New Delhi, Feb 10 (TIWN): The Supreme Court on Friday said a judge is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, as the courts are open and the judges speak by giving reasons in writing for their decisions, while giving detailed reasons for not entertaining two pleas filed against appointment of L.C. Victoria Gowri as judge of the Madras High Court.

A bench comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna and B.R. Gavai said: “Principle of secularism and dignity of every individual – regardless of the religion, caste or creed, is the foundation of Rule of Law and equal protection of laws.”

It further added: “Not only is the conduct and judgments delivered considered at the time of confirmation, a judge is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, as the courts are open and the judges speak by giving reasons in writing for their decisions”.

The petitioners alleged that Gowri made “hate speeches” against Christians and Muslims and therefore, she was unfit to the post.

The bench said there have been cases where the persons recommended for elevation have expressed reservations or even criticised policies or actions, but this has not been held to be a ground to treat them as unsuitable.

The apex court said Article 51A of the Constitution casts an obligation on every citizen, and more so on every judge, to promote harmony, spirit of common brotherhood among all transcending religious, linguistic, regional or sectional diversities.

The bench said the person in question has been elevated as an additional judge and “on taking oath the person pledges to work as a judge to uphold the Constitution and the laws”. On February 7, the court had dismissed the petitions.