TIWN
New Delhi, July 20 (TIWN) The Supreme Court on Tuesday said its order should have been followed as it heard contempt petitions over non-compliance of its February 2020 directions for electoral candidates to disclose criminal antecedents through wide publication.
The plea claimed these directions were not adhered during the Bihar Assembly election last year. As counsel appearing for a political party tendered an unconditional apology, stating that this should not have happened and that there shouldn't be criminalisation of politics, a bench of Justices R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai said: "We don't buy this sorry; our orders have to be followed."
Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing the Election Commission, submitted that the Nationalist Congress Party fielded 26 candidates with criminal antecedents and the CPI-M had fielded four candidates with criminal antecedents. However, the Rashtriya Janata Dal is the biggest defaulter with 103 candidates having criminal antecedents, while the Janata Dal-United had fielded 56 such candidates and the BJP 77 candidates, he said.
- SC to hear on Monday Bengal govt's plea against Calcutta HC order axing 25,753 school jobs
- Bihar: Anant Singh released from jail on parole
- Will Chandrababu Naidu's winning streak continue in Andhra's Kuppam?
- Gujarat gears up for May 7 LS polls
- Rahul dares PM Modi to promise removal of 50 pc quota limit, says 'Cong will do if voted to power'